Today's hottest deals

HP 500-377nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-377nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 18:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 166
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 300
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 48
44% 52.5 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 45.1
37% 45.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 63 23 59 26 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 340
Write 368
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 51.3
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 72.6
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 0.4
35% 81 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
928GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,387
Write 4.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 46.1
615% 861 MB/s
4K Read 129
4K Mixed 0.2
8,115% 64.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron CT51264BD160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-377nf Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-377nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback