HP Laptop 14-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 14-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887C
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 08:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 112
48% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 390
35% 297 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.56.05
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 13.3
6% 11.4 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 14.4
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 459 486 499 544 541 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 654
Write 523
Mixed 541
SusWrite 502
125% 555 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 23
75% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 349
230% 278 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 91%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback