HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A3E
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 23:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 121
2-Core 248
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 676
73% 578 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8A3E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.02.04
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 22.5
6% 16.3 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 15.5
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-512G-1006 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 760 791 805 678 667 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 965
Write 927
Mixed 903
SusWrite 748
200% 886 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 41.8
132% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 571
404% 524 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 148%
Great: 434%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE094D
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx Builds (Compare 675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback