Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 08:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 342
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 91.3
55% 73.8 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 77.1
Splatting 46.1
50% 63 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256ASTMM1600X 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 233 238 275 276 274 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 240
Write 165
Mixed 232
SusWrite 249
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 24
72% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 150
130% 194 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 96%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$68
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 136 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 133
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 136
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 104%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 12TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 277 310 338 142 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 55.5
Write 184
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 231
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
191% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 285%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 21.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 12
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q270M-D3H Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback