Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 05:25
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 201
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 352
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1212 1057 585 599 403 551 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 2,001
Write 1,778
Mixed 1,355
SusWrite 734
328% 1,467 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 47.4
158% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 559
405% 537 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 197%
Great: 295%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$68
520GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 91 84 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 107
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 89.6
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q270M-D3H Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback