Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 12:02
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 191
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 358
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 23.4
14% 22.2 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 20
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Histor DS-20G-E100 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H170208a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 47 41 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 447
Write 329
Mixed 339
SusWrite 55.8
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 24.8
104% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 89.6
96% 154 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 75%
VendorC ProductCode 32GB
29GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 24 32 32 33 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 207
Write 24.3
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 25.3
54% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.6
115% 6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB
1GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
0% 0.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramsta Ramsta-2666MHz-4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 28
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback