CMS 9876-4011A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCMS 9876-4011A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 10:43
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 56
2-Core 121
48% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 144
21% 152 Pts
64-Core 73.9
5% 73.9 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 5.6
4% 32.6 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00R1TB 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2301B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 274 281 225 171 290 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 143
Write 190
Mixed 184
SusWrite 245
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 4.5
36% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 15.2
58% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 99%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 96 93 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 92.5
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 93.6
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 9905622-058.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 9876-4011A Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: CMS 9876-4011A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback