Lenovo 2209A12

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2209A12  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Dory CRB
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 23:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 88.4
37% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 152
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Legend(17AA 3082) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 500GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 174 206 138 106 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46% Average
Read 224
Write 219
Mixed 217
SusWrite 164
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 15.9
67% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 3.4
43% 102 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BA160BJ.M8F CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.4% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2209A12 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 2209A12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback