Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 17 '15 at 18:39
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 116
55% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 159
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 0A16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 5.47
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.39
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M6-240 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.4% Good
Read 505
Write 278
Mixed 375
85% 386 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 16.7
89% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 60.5
69% 111 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1600S3V64L11/8G Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback