Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 154% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 178% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220224
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '22 at 12:46
Run Duration	516 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$314 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 83.5 1-Core 142 2-Core 285 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 1,064 95% 803 Pts	64-Core 2,216 137% 2,216 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$520 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% EVGA(3842 3785) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Lighting 248 Reflection 222 Parallax 218 202% 229 fps	MRender 265 Gravity 163 Splatting 133 146% 187 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T1R0B-68A4Z0 2TB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1.5TB free Firmware: 411000WR SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 397 416 422 431 426 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 416 Mixed 330 SusWrite 413 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 40 134% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 204 158% 217 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 119%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140 12,308 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 1035 1041 1034 992 1026 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,294 Write 2,207 Mixed 1,558 SusWrite 1,179 354% 1,560 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 60.9 190% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,262 DQ Write 368 DQ Mixed 399 402% 676 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 303%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 4.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 151 155 154 160 163 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 144 Write 158 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 157 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 3.1 19% 6.13 MB/s	DQ Read 5.2 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 2.2 4% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 26%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239 995 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 211 210 211 213 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 219 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 211 130% 179 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 213% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 122%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239 995 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 949GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 106 106 107 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 145 Write 150 Mixed 70.9 SusWrite 105 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.7 221% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 122%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB 480 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 109 110 111 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 135 Write 146 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 109 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1 305% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 136%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 3.5TB free Firmware: LEGNT925 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 233 221 238 233 232 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 215 Mixed 107 SusWrite 230 137% 188 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 2.1 446% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 136%
WD WD140EMFZ-11 14TB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 3TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 99 101 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 123 Write 134 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 99.8 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.4 289% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 117%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2.5TB free Firmware: LEGNT925 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 110 110 110 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 136%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB 480 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 176 181 173 178 183 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 225 Write 239 Mixed 106 SusWrite 179 137% 187 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1 296% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 136%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 129 132 130 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 106 Write 114 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 130 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 305% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 115%
Hitachi HUH721212ALN600 12TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 2.5TB free Firmware: LEGNT3D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 163 163 169 170 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 149 Write 150 Mixed 84 SusWrite 167 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.7 343% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 137%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 706GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 90.7 Write 91 Mixed 75 SusWrite 89 118% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 60%
WDC WD40 03FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 92 93 93 94 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 231 Write 241 Mixed 128 SusWrite 92.3 224% 173 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 1.6 310% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 102%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 116 117 115 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 114 Mixed 76.6 SusWrite 114 139% 101 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 219% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 82%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 116 117 116 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 145 Write 148 Mixed 112 SusWrite 115 174% 130 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 1.2 275% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 86%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 806GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.6% Above average	Read 154 Write 169 Mixed 120 SusWrite 16.8 149% 115 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 0.9 340% 4.37 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 6.1 DQ Mixed 1.4 257% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 54%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 581GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 155 Write 153 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 16.8 127% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.6 268% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 72%
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.2% Average	Read 162 Write 175 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 17.1 137% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.7 201% 2.3 MB/s

WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB 4.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 53 53 52 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.1% Above average	Read 198 Write 212 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 52.9 173% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 2.07 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 4x8GB 1,280 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 37.2 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 34.5 80% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $215Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,068x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $150Bench 98%, 89,263 samples	757x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $137Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	580x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	575x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	375x
RTX 3070Nvidia $450Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	352x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $117Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	429x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $117Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	365x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	230x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $86Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	134x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $1,032

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $107	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389