Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive365% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration368 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$210
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 213
2-Core 409
124% 236 Pts
4-Core 829
8-Core 1,228
128% 1,028 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 121%
Great: 120%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2280 2202 1185 1189 1176 1196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2,363
Write 2,336
Mixed 1,718
SusWrite 1,538
447% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 96.5
325% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,874
DQ Write 1,529
DQ Mixed 1,669
1,258% 1,691 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 365%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4387 4333 4375 4353 4335 4313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
648% Outstanding
Read 4,487
Write 4,369
Mixed 3,020
SusWrite 4,349
913% 4,056 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 92.2
347% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 2,298
DQ Write 2,075
DQ Mixed 2,123
1,610% 2,165 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 648%
Great: 622%
WDC WDS200T2B0B- 2TB
903GB free
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 478 476 479 481 482 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 378
Mixed 185
SusWrite 466
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 37.8
153% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 147
127% 185 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4444 4430 4420 4402 4328 4361 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
660% Outstanding
Read 4,556
Write 4,495
Mixed 3,032
SusWrite 4,398
928% 4,120 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 270
4K Mixed 94.1
367% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 2,402
DQ Write 2,012
DQ Mixed 2,144
1,623% 2,186 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 660%
Great: 622%
AMicro AM8180 NVME 256GB
161GB free, PID 1101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 45.4
Write 37.6
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 37.8
53% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 17.4
1,101% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 17.7
1,302% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 77.8
MC Mixed 70.2
195% 68.2 GB/s
SC Read 55.4
SC Write 76.9
SC Mixed 62.5
186% 64.9 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 189%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X670 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 397%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback