Lenovo 82C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82C5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 16:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 65
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 500
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Legend(17AA 3FDC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3113
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.5 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 10.3
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 865 423 374 380 383 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,147
Write 1169
Mixed 1,010
SusWrite 520
216% 961 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 67.8
227% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 557
413% 572 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 174%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4082CAA1G4HB1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.3% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C5 Builds (Compare 1,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback