Lenovo 82C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82C5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 16:50
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 109
44% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 484
47% 388 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Legend(17AA 3FDC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 7.4
6% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 10.7
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 149 156 139 111 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 830
Write 226
Mixed 330
SusWrite 133
83% 380 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 38
154% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 161
126% 173 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 173%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: SBFK66C5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 350 300 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 371
Write 270
Mixed 321
SusWrite 208
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 25.2
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 176
150% 217 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4082CAA1G4HB1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO81EC
Typical 82C5 Builds (Compare 1,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback