TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X530FN
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 12:18
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 180
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 569
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 72.5%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Asus(1043 1C0E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 19.7
16% 19.6 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 17.3
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 15.9%
 Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1002 512GB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 745 671 570 531 504 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 921
Write 952
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 641
202% 896 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 31.7
129% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 450
342% 463 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 136%
 Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4S240FSDK.8FBD Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.4% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 66.4%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples163x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples161x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples239x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples87x
SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples91x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples21x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples12x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples117x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples23x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback