Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory49.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 237
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 803
76% 632 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Zotac(19DA 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 178
Parallax 184
147% 181 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 158
Splatting 131
128% 160 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 1TB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 892 867 924 940 936 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WD20EZAZ-00G 2TB
51GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 169 140 161 109 136 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 159
Write 133
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 148
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 0.4
8% 3.63 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
2% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
14GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 91 92 89 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 89.9
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 91.5
54% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
582GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 137 134 133 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 107
Write 74.2
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 135
67% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
559GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 108 106 106 104 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 81.7
Write 54.6
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 106
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MG07ACA1 12TB
24GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 106 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41% Average
Read 35.5
Write 91.1
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 107
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GVK CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GVK 64GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 31.4
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 30.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,099
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback