PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 4223B35 (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO LENOVO |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161027 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 01 '23 at 17:51 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
58.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 143 144 142 144 144 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
31GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 122 138 136 136 128 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
42.1%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9965516-479.A 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 01stBench 59%, 1,097 samples | 3x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 3x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 3x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $387Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $280 |