Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 21:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 274
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2340) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cs900 SSD 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0916A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 407 410 410 413 406 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 411
Mixed 405
SusWrite 408
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 28.5
128% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 48.3
93% 181 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 94%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
459GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 141 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 141
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 139
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 Micron 9KSF51272AZ-1G6E1 M378B2873FH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback