Today's hottest deals

HP HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP HP  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8377
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190718
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 14:19
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 126
51% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 320
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 8377) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS500GSSD220Q 500GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 140 237 250 254 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 337
Write 252
Mixed 40
SusWrite 191
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 0.4
22% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 0.5
57% 133 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 98%
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
210GB free
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 205 218 281 244 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 473
Write 431
Mixed 499
SusWrite 242
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 307
242% 345 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 147%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 299 257 277 281 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 274
Write 307
Mixed 249
SusWrite 282
63% 278 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 12
40% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 47.6
46% 69 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.8% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.9
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HP Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: HP HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback