MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP62M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 09:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MMR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 179
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 400
37% 308 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 6.2
0% 15.4 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B-00YS70 250GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 231 235 224 209 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 414
Write 419
Mixed 198
SusWrite 224
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 34.2
113% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 132
155% 268 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 105%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
397GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 73.8
Write 77.3
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 88.7
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 86D3 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 12.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback