Today's hottest deals

Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory116.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 17:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 63.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 914
81% 685 Pts
64-Core 2,330
144% 2,330 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
166% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 254
Parallax 324
177% 265 fps
MRender 327
Gravity 238
Splatting 173
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 166%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 960 882 825 818 412 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,265
Write 1,747
Mixed 1,417
SusWrite 855
350% 1,571 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 54.5
176% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 520
400% 550 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 223%
Great: 372%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$149
6TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 180 182 178 179 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 123
Write 182
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 179
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.5
217% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 192 193 193 193 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 107%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2TB free, PID 2638
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 109 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 61
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 110
109% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.8
223% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GIS F4-3000C16-16GISB F4-3200C16-16GIS F4-3000C16-16GISB F4-3200C16-16GIS F4-3000C16-16GISB F4-3200C16-16GIS F4-3000C16-16GISB 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
127% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 49.5
144% 50.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 20.8
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 127%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback