Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Memory 13.1 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 38.7 15% 26 Pts	4-Core 63.5 8-Core 76.7 9% 70.1 Pts	64-Core 38.9 2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3821) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.3 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4 3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R3G5P SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 210 240 254 161 107 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 204 Write 225 Mixed 212 SusWrite 196 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 13.8 35% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 82.4 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 134 94% 117 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3170ED58F8W1600 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.86% Terrible	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.4 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 376 11% 376 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 31%, 28,018 samples	17x
A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 32%, 12,494 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	17x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	3x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
Savage 240GBHyperX $117Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	5x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	3x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	1x