Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_F515JA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_F515JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JA
Memory16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 17:27
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 209
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 14F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 8.4
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 988
Write 675
Mixed 737
177% 800 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53
183% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 479
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 561
405% 520 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 859B CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_F515JA Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_F515JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback