bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory29.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 08:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Memory 19.5
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 56.3
20% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 212
18% 153 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 38 38 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 84.9
Write 64.9
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 38.7
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.3
427% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 95%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 376GB
149GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 39 39 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 80.3
Write 67.3
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 39.4
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.2
426% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 35GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 32767 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 324
12% 324 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback