Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FL
Memory16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 15:12
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 42
2-Core 88.7
47% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 258
26% 212 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1FBE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 5.3
4% 10.1 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 7
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,006
Write 1,264
Mixed 1,083
251% 1,117 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 56.1
180% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 598
442% 588 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
316GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 81 67 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 124
Write 146
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 79.6
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 18.5
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback