Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hynix

HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2022.

Average Bench: 47% (118th of 132)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB
Poor: 32%Average: 47% Great: 63%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB averaged 52.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 18GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 17.5GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB is 31.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 13.5GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Rank 11847%
Min Avg Max
12.7 MC Read 18 23.8
10.4 MC Write 17.5 23.8
9.1 MC Mixed 13.5 18.5
46.6% 16.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9 SC Read 11.1 13.9
10.7 SC Write 17 26.5
10.4 SC Mixed 14.8 21
40.9% 14.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
74.8 Latency 90.7 110
44.1% 90.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
63.3% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 18.5
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 15
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
53.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
37.1% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
31.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,299,403 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_A512FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples38x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples26x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples14x
SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel  $66Bench 156%, 162,275 samples33x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples1x
SSDSCKKF180H6 SATA 180GBIntelBench 68%, 873 samples1x
RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GBHynixBench 47%, 6 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66

Popular HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 04CD F4-3200C22-16GRS 20GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 2 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback