Fujitsu CELSIUS W5011

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W5011  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3917-A1
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 16:34
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-1390P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 178
2-Core 349
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 1,082
107% 876 Pts
64-Core 1621
100% 1621 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000
Nvidia(10DE 12DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.8% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 52
Parallax 44.1
38% 47.5 fps
MRender 52.2
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 45.7
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7602Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,927
Write 3,188
Mixed 2,924
675% 3,013 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 108
358% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,108
845% 1,152 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 423%
Seagate ST4000NM000B-2TF100 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: TN01
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 224
Write 216
Mixed 201
161% 214 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.3
2,243% 18.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2G43BB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 33.2
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 31.5
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W5011 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W5011

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback