Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 676
71% 568 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 112
Parallax 130
104% 123 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 124
Splatting 103
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 202 190 187 172 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 369
Write 389
Mixed 332
SusWrite 196
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 50.4
167% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 247
187% 252 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
39GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,468
Write 2,224
Mixed 1,832
484% 2,175 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 69.7
231% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 932
688% 910 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
7GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 124 112 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 101
Write 98.1
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 119
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
22GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 126 122 132 159 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70% Very good
Read 107
Write 86.9
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 136
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
88GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 146 150 151 150 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 87
Write 94.9
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 150
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 029E CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 029E CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 19.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback