Asrock H77M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77M  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '17 at 12:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 324
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB
CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.31
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 2.09
1% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 69.8
Write 89.7
Mixed 61.2
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.39
73% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 88%
BUFFALO HD-PCU2 640GB
27GB free, PID 01d9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 39.1
Mixed 16.7
38% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.28
54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback