Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 176 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 393 43% 339 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Lighting 62.8 Reflection 69 Parallax 63.1 51% 65 fps	MRender 65.1 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 65.6 53% 64.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB 848 User benchmarks, average bench 221% 455GB free (System drive) Firmware: VC0S034B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 606 615 811 918 991 955 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,598 Write 1,170 Mixed 963 SusWrite 816 254% 1,137 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 31.7 106% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 418 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 408 292% 378 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 327%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65 6,111 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 355GB free Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 252 319 309 300 314 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 352 Write 363 Mixed 318 SusWrite 291 75% 331 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 19.7 65% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 258 188% 248 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 104%
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190 3,375 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 408GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 260 324 186 246 287 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 433 Write 382 Mixed 329 SusWrite 258 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 23.4 84% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 193 178% 274 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FB 4x16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.5% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 25.3 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 18.7 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	126x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	90x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	37x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	10x
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	8x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	6x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	18x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,275 samples	14x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	5x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $140

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16