Today's hottest deals

Biostar H510MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H510MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 00:43
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 726
70% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
Nvidia(10DE 163D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.7% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 85.5
65% 81.6 fps
MRender 79.8
Gravity 68
Splatting 61.4
56% 69.7 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD WIN MEMORY 2 5 480 GB 480GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 5.9 199 7.2 7.5 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 438
Write 464
Mixed 46
SusWrite 71.5
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 7.6
51% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAS84U6DWA 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar H510MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback