Today's hottest deals

Biostar H510MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar H510MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 22:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$106
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 237
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 712
70% 575 Pts
64-Core 878
54% 878 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
Nvidia(10DE 163D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 84.6
Parallax 90.5
84% 92.7 fps
MRender 84.8
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 65.2
60% 74.1 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BTSDA-480G-535 480GB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2818b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 402 414 81 55 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 440
Write 428
Mixed 362
SusWrite 260
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 11.9
86% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 16.1
72% 160 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 92%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
59GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 41 37 36 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 54.8
Write 32.7
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 38.8
52% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAS84U6DWA 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar H510MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback