HP Laptop 17-by0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-by0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84CA
Memory8.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime9 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 12:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 157
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 237
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 84CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$80
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 781 972 1045 907 855 543 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,604
Write 1,122
Mixed 988
SusWrite 850
255% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 51.9
165% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 412
312% 426 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 187%
Great: 308%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
772GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 122 126 111 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 163
Write 19.4
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 118
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4S24AM.M16FE Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-by0xxx Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-by0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback