PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Undefined Undefined (all builds) |
Motherboard | Undefined Undefined |
Memory | 48.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180626 |
Uptime | 6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '23 at 20:03 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
83.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 69 119 121 114 106 MB/s
|
74.6%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 840 250GB
216GB free
Firmware: 8B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 9.9 9.1 8.9 12 14 MB/s
|
||||
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
196GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 105 106 97 MB/s
|
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
116GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 63 65 53 59 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
531GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 4.7 5.3 5.4 2.4 1.3 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elpida EBJ17RG4BFWD-JS-F 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2680 v2IntelBench 71%, 1,619 samples | 2x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |