MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory31.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210629
Uptime20.7 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 03:23
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 759
77% 622 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 174
Parallax 180
147% 178 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 676 572 575 539 606 575 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,866
Write 1,667
Mixed 1,649
SusWrite 590
323% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 60
203% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,041
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 873
650% 869 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 212%
Great: 347%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
131GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 84 84 78 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 80.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 60.5
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
123% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 69%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
112GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.2 3.1 2.7 1.1 2.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 75
Write 80.7
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 2.5
74% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
51GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 5.9 4.8 3.9 1.9 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 8.7
108% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25%
Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
104GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 128 131 131 132 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 96.4
SusWrite 127
160% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
965GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 130 133 133 134 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 92.5
Write 104
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 129
145% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
39GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.2 2.2 1.9 0.4 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 45.8
Write 55.7
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 1.6
47% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0 2TB
38GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 120
Write 27.1
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 0.6
43% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 36%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
19GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 50 52 53 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 53.4
Write 57.9
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 49.8
74% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 48%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-75U6AA0 500GB
60GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 52 54 53 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 51.4
115% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 37.5
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 33
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 5,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $973
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback