Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 19:49
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 238
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 803
78% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,292
80% 1,292 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 79.2
54% 68.9 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 53
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 417 416 427 426 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 429
Mixed 384
SusWrite 418
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 43.3
141% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 185
144% 199 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 127%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$81
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 199 200 200 201 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 135
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 198
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
198GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 48.2
114% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
385GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.1 6.3 6 6 6 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 6.1
104% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26%
Great: 37%
ST330006 51NS 3TB
574GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 49 48 48 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 142
Write 128
Mixed 66
SusWrite 48.2
121% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39%
Great: 45%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
193GB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 45 47 47 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.9% Poor
Read 90
Write 85.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 46.4
91% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 38%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
156GB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 5.7 6 6 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 101
Write 114
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 5.9
88% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 5.9 6 6 6 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 138
Write 138
Mixed 70
SusWrite 6.1
109% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
132GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 47 48 48 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 173
Write 158
Mixed 64
SusWrite 48.5
137% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
148% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 72%
ST330006 50NS 3TB
2TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6 6.2 6.1 6 6.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 144
Write 143
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 6.1
111% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 25.1
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback