Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 01:34
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$194
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 127
58% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 394
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.6% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 61
Parallax 86.2
54% 71 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 52.1
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1.5TB free
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 371 384 413 410 417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 425
Mixed 386
SusWrite 392
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 44.6
145% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 230
176% 238 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 127%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 168 195 185 202 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 224
Mixed 32
SusWrite 189
110% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
374% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
449GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 135 135 134 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 160
Write 124
Mixed 83
SusWrite 133
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 109%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 74 77 76 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
45% Average
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 100
SusWrite 76
153% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
131GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 74 77 76 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 171
Write 176
Mixed 112
SusWrite 76
175% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
142% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
385GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 75 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 75.1
128% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 37%
ST330006 51NS 3TB
575GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 75 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 146
Write 135
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 75.2
139% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
193GB free, PID 0562
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
Read 89.8
Write 92
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.7
112% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
156GB free, PID 0562
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 91 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 97
SusWrite 89.5
137% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 53%
ST330006 50NS 3TB
2TB free, PID 9561
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 72
SusWrite 92.3
142% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
ST330006 50NS 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 9561
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 92 93 93 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
Read 145
Write 137
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 92.5
145% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
129% 1.53 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.2
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback