PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160624 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Feb 01 '23 at 15:24 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
176GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 102 116 122 123 123 MB/s
|
45.1%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 53 54 70 73 79 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements SE 2622 5TB
10GB free, PID 2622
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 21 21 22 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
640GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 37 37 37 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
251GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 40 41 41 41 MB/s
|
18%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 4,587x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 848x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 603x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 995x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 895x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 474x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $758 |