Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80VR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80VR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-75I
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 20:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 159
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 402
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 38E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 7
5% 27.3 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,544
Write 775
Mixed 593
212% 970 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 47.4
150% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 559
418% 558 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 226%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$36
79GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 90 93 91 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41% Average
Read 51.4
Write 76.7
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 91.4
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 Kingston 9905700-025.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.5% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 18.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80VR Builds (Compare 1,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Lenovo 80VR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback