Today's hottest deals

Hasee QTK5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHasee QTK5  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150127
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 03:30
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 138
48% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 236
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Quanta(152D 1121) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2824
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 6.5
17% 14.6 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 14.7
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK 1TB 1TB
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 293 288 247 98 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 174
Write 246
Mixed 160
SusWrite 211
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 15.1
63% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 43.2
80% 155 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 223%
Sk600 1TB 1TB
359GB free
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 77 170 173 3 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
267GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 30 28 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 24.7
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 27.1
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DH0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QTK5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Hasee QTK5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback