Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '17 at 02:41
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 89 2-Core 195 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 352 46% 348 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 38.1 33% 36.5 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 40 Splatting 36.6 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 4068 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 582 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4969416427408 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 32 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 14 (AE) Unknown 100 100 25 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 46 231928234020 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2770267538053 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1761 (EA) Unknown 100 100 9046 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3784 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4293 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	43.3% Average	Read 478 Write 79.5 Mixed 15.1 40% 191 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 2.48 48% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 93.2 DQ Mixed 0.02 38% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 71%
Samsung HD161GJ 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 62GB free Firmware: P0422C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 714 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 103 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 133 (A3) Unknown 100 100 19 (A4) Unknown 100 100 12201 (A5) Unknown 100 100 14 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 6 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 3 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 25897 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4099 (F5) Unknown 100 100 24402	19.7% Very poor	Read 394 Write 58.7 Mixed 217 48% 223 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.27 1% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 838GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896895160 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1457 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3696 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 580 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3464 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3464 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 171799543838 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.8% Good	Read 103 Write 109 Mixed 157 94% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.09 41% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD1 1x8GB 971 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.7% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B150M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	245x
Core i7-6700Intel $163Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	131x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	122x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	76x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	22x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	19x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353