Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350XAA-K09HK
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 04:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MAC-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3865U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 50.8
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 64.1
32% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 66.5
8-Core 69.6
9% 68.1 Pts
64-Core 64.7
4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 3
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zhitai SC001 Active 512GB SSD
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZT016200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 215 253 297 262 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 327
Write 263
Mixed 306
SusWrite 263
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 22.5
70% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 130
100% 138 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback