Asus PRIME B250M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-C  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210714
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 13:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 203
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Device(1B4C 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 15.6
14% 16.2 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 14.8
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zhitai TiPlus7100 1TB
917GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZTA22001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1410 1522 1503 1543 1482 1472 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,429
Write 1,594
Mixed 1,340
SusWrite 1,489
330% 1,463 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 43.8
130% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 444
324% 424 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 208%
Great: 557%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
291GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 111 112 114 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 129
Write 143
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 111
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B250M-C Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback