Today's hottest deals

Wincor B/iPOS+ Advanced Cel-G1820TE,4GB,PCT,HDD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 75% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemWincor B/iPOS+ Advanced Cel-G1820TE,4GB,PCT,HDD  (all builds)
MotherboardWINCOR D611H81
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '17 at 13:52
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1820TE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Memory 16.6
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 94.3
22% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 94.3
8-Core 94.1
13% 94.2 Pts
64-Core 93.4
6% 93.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0402) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3345
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 2.91
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.52
3% 3.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49% Average
Read 486
Write 245
Mixed 248
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 6.6
40% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 10.3
22% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.B353G.C0J0C Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 347
12% 347 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback