Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 09:10
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1820TE
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 86.4
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 122
57% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 120
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 78.9
52% 64.1 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 39.9
43% 54.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA004R22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 279 341 339 358 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 400
Write 356
Mixed 328
SusWrite 322
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 36
125% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 217
168% 229 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Wireless Stick 64GB
33GB free, PID 55a9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 12.2
Write 12.6
Mixed 11
SusWrite 11
16% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.6
159% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (83rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.6" 1280 720 RTK2A3B Display
Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback