Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '17 at 05:39
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 145 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 362 40% 318 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 38.3 33% 36.9 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 37 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 585 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 398 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 235 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3691973905	81.2% Excellent	Read 495 Write 392 Mixed 404 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 22.7 119% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 40.5 DQ Write 67.6 DQ Mixed 21.7 26% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 254GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 164648872 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 872 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5926822 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 711 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 605 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 89 89 11 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 505282590 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 417 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6756 (C2) HDA temperature 30 47 25769803806 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 39436389712230 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7398365385 (F2) Unknown 100 253 8222029676	106% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 169 Mixed 158 132% 176 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.31 102% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 133GB free Firmware: VT100-50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 5760 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8649 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3850 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4441 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2228227 (BE) vendor-specific 148 88 30 (C2) HDA temperature 148 88 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 136503 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	32.6% Below average	Read 55.1 Write 58.5 Mixed 57.2 43% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.32 71% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata Kingston 99U5471-054.A 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	53.5% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 19.5 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 15.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	952x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	863x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	399x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	283x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	181x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	162x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	142x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	109x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	150x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	62x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16