Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G232

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicroelectronics G232  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B660M-A AC D4
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 20:40
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$111
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 174
2-Core 304
101% 187 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 939
94% 766 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
ASRock(1849 5236) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 135
Parallax 232
97% 162 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 126
Splatting 186
142% 172 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1349 516 471 485 334 544 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,938
Write 2,121
Mixed 1,888
SusWrite 617
369% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 81.7
311% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,690
DQ Write 1,430
DQ Mixed 1,438
1,111% 1,519 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 280%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd GKE800UD102408-2666A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G232 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G232

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 126% - Outstanding Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback