Today's hottest deals

Biostar H510MHP 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP 2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '23 at 09:17
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$123
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 57.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 228
70% 132 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 678
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Biostar(1565 111A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 6.9
5% 7 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R3C0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 390 385 351 195 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 357
Write 349
Mixed 315
SusWrite 318
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 30.2
106% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 223
173% 233 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
903GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 108 109 107 107 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 59.2
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 106
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MK5065GSX 500GB
462GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 35 35 30 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 52.4
Write 32.4
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 33.5
46% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd GKE800UD102408-2666A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.1
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 30 60 7.2" 1280 720 RTK1D1A
Typical H510MHP 2.0 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback