Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HCB
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 03:04
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-11260H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 45.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 227
72% 137 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 666
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 779
48% 779 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 13FC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.5% Average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 54.5
51% 61.9 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 49.5
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 65%
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 2.6
4% 25.2 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 5.5
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: 82C6U67A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 506 524 554 462 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 545
Mixed 691
SusWrite 485
206% 945 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 49.5
134% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 658
487% 649 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 184%
Great: 453%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 8.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB Builds (Compare 3,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback