Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '17 at 23:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 81.9
45% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 232
24% 195 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7790
XFX(1682 3310) 1GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 31.8
22% 29.4 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 32.7
23% 28 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 115
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.46
104% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 77.3
Write 64.9
Mixed 75.7
55% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.3
104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1333 CL9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 12.4
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback