Today's hottest deals

Asus A_F_K31ADE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus A_F_K31ADE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A_F_K31ADE
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 18:24
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$49
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 154
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 241
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 4
0% 2.07 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
527GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 85 77 66 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 130
Write 143
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 77.4
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 107%
WD My Passport 2626 1TB
450GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 51.9
Write 37.1
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 20.1
44% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
135GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 57 58 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 60.1
Write 61
Mixed 44
SusWrite 57.5
75% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
163% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
322GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 79 79 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 55.8
Write 63.6
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 77.4
78% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
201GB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 17.4
37% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 53%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
449GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 86 94 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 98.3
Write 88.2
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 90.9
113% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
551GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 48 56 38 39 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 75.8
Write 43.2
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 42.8
67% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
146GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 40.6
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 41.2
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-181.A00LF 0218 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_F_K31ADE Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A_F_K31ADE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback